-Regards,NewSense IN Team

January 18, 2012

The SOPA & PIPA Hype:Extracting Contents


Many of you might not be familiar with the fact that its the US Congress Anti-Piracy Act Called SOPA(meaning Stop Online Piracy Act) & PIPA(Protect IP Act) bill being battled out in the legislation..
Many Internet sites have gone off for protest against this.As of the law,when asked Jimmy Wales,Wikipedia founder explained that,The Piracy  Act Might Take on Freedom  from the Citizens.Due to which today most of them have announced a Web Blackout.
 But the Piracy Act is being supported by Authors & Film fraternity as most of the piracy occurs in this sector.As reported earlier by us,Google might also join the SOPA protest.The buzz around the whole thing has been a bit confusing,going on that many sites including Facebook allow the sharing feature.


What does the legislation do?
There are already laws that protect copyrighted material, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). But while the DMCA focuses on removing specific, unauthorized content from the Internet, SOPA and PIPA instead target the platform -- that is, the site hosting the unauthorized content.
The bills would give the Justice Department the power to go after foreign websites willfully committing or facilitating intellectual property theft -- "rogue" sites like The Pirate Bay. The government would be able to force U.S.-based companies, like Internet service providers, credit card companies and online advertisers, to cut off ties with those sites.
Why Internet companies oppose SOPA and PIPA
Internet companies and their investors would readily say that they're holding the "blackout" to protect their corporate interests -- and the entire burgeoning Internet-based economy.
"The success of Reddit... is one of the smaller examples of the success that has happened in our industry -- and will continue to unless bills like SOPA or PIPA become law," Ohanian said Tuesday.
Under the rules SOPA or PIPA would impose, Ohanian and others argue, start ups wouldn't be able to handle the costs that come with defending their sites against possible violations. Such sites would not be able to pay the large teams of lawyers that established sites like Google or Facebook can afford.
The legislation in question targets foreign companies whose primary purpose is to sell stolen or counterfeit goods -- but opponents say domestic companies could still be held liable for linking to their content. While sites like Reddit wouldn't have a legal duty to monitor their sites all the time, "you might have your pants sued off of you" if you don't, said Jayme White, staff director for the Senate Finance Subcommittee on international trade.
Brad Burnham, managing partner at the venture capital fund Union Square Ventures, said his company has avoided investing in companies related to the music industry because of the copyright risks -- but under the proposed legislation, that risk would hit just about any Internet company. SOPA and PIPA, he said, "takes the risk of frivolous litigation... to the entire Internet."
That should be a concern, Burnham said, when the Internet accounts for 21 percent of economic growth among developed nations, according to one study.
The impacts could go beyond the economy, some argue. Rebecca MacKinnon, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan New America Foundation, argues that if blogging platforms are motivated to monitor their content, that could have "a tremendous chilling effect on people tyring to conduct political discourse and trying to use content in a fair use context."

-extracts from CbsNews & NewSense Bureau


Post a Comment

Twitter Facebook

Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Best Web Host